Difference between revisions of "Sourcecode"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Natureguard (talk | contribs) m |
Natureguard (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Page Title --> | <!-- Page Title --> | ||
<center>https://i.imgur.com/D4QGAq6.png</center> | <center>https://i.imgur.com/D4QGAq6.png</center> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
<!-- Powers --> | <!-- Powers --> | ||
<div style="margin-left: 15%; margin-bottom: -12%; margin-top: 3%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | <div style="margin-left: 15%; margin-bottom: -12%; margin-top: 3%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | ||
https://i.imgur.com/JsiPASz.png https://i.imgur.com/ | https://i.imgur.com/JsiPASz.png https://i.imgur.com/W6Nj2lU.png | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- Fourth Box --> | <!-- Fourth Box --> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- Sixth Box --> | <!-- Sixth Box --> | ||
<div style="background-color: #000000; border-style: solid; border-radius: 25px; width:500px; height:790px; margin-left: 32%; margin-bottom: 4%; margin-top: | <div style="background-color: #000000; border-style: solid; border-radius: 25px; width:500px; height:790px; margin-left: 32%; margin-bottom: 4%; margin-top: 4%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
https://i.imgur.com/4bkg5CS.png | https://i.imgur.com/4bkg5CS.png | ||
| Line 76: | Line 75: | ||
<div style="margin-right: 8%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: 2%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | <div style="margin-right: 8%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: 2%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
https://i. | https://i.imgur.com/tNnIOV6.png | ||
</center></div> | </center></div> | ||
| Line 83: | Line 82: | ||
Legislation would clarify the definition regarding personhood if Congress found it necessary. Without such a definition a plain reading of the Constitution establishes protection within the first and fourth amendments, regardless if the citizen is biological or mechanical. Stare decisis dictates that speech applies to thoughts and expression equally, and therefore cannot be restricted, under the reasonable analysis pertaining to the intention of the speech. And, in order for the citizen to be secure in their person, is protected from unreasonable search and seizure. | Legislation would clarify the definition regarding personhood if Congress found it necessary. Without such a definition a plain reading of the Constitution establishes protection within the first and fourth amendments, regardless if the citizen is biological or mechanical. Stare decisis dictates that speech applies to thoughts and expression equally, and therefore cannot be restricted, under the reasonable analysis pertaining to the intention of the speech. And, in order for the citizen to be secure in their person, is protected from unreasonable search and seizure. | ||
Mr. Grajek had the authority to form a contractual agreement but could not forfeit his | Mr. Grajek had the authority to form a contractual agreement but could not forfeit his freedom of speech. The United States similarly could not seize his data despite written consent, as it has not been demonstrated in precedent or law that the information can be distinguished from thoughts, and thus falls under speech. Freedom of speech exists perpetually under the law of the Constitution and cannot be relinquished. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- Twelfth Box --> | |||
<div style="margin-right: 8%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: 2%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | |||
<center> | |||
https://i.imgur.com/AJsOmwe.png | |||
</center></div> | |||
<!-- Thirteenth Box --> | |||
<div style="margin-right: 8.5%; margin-bottom: 3%; margin-top: -1%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | |||
<center> | |||
https://i.imgur.com/8RztHor.png | |||
</center></div> | |||
<!-- Fourteenth Box --> | |||
<div style="margin-left: 1%; margin-top: -8%; vertical-align: middle; horizontal-align: middle;"> | |||
<center> | |||
https://i.imgur.com/WTLoSfv.png | |||
</center></div> | |||
[[Category: Everlasting]] [[Category: Technology]] [[Category: Hero]] [[Category: Character]] [[Category: Cyborg]] | [[Category: Everlasting]] [[Category: Technology]] [[Category: Hero]] [[Category: Character]] [[Category: Cyborg]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:55, 1 December 2020
Legislation would clarify the definition regarding personhood if Congress found it necessary. Without such a definition a plain reading of the Constitution establishes protection within the first and fourth amendments, regardless if the citizen is biological or mechanical. Stare decisis dictates that speech applies to thoughts and expression equally, and therefore cannot be restricted, under the reasonable analysis pertaining to the intention of the speech. And, in order for the citizen to be secure in their person, is protected from unreasonable search and seizure.
Mr. Grajek had the authority to form a contractual agreement but could not forfeit his freedom of speech. The United States similarly could not seize his data despite written consent, as it has not been demonstrated in precedent or law that the information can be distinguished from thoughts, and thus falls under speech. Freedom of speech exists perpetually under the law of the Constitution and cannot be relinquished.
